GS4 · UPSC Mains

Slums & Low-Income Areas in Urban Periphery where power is needed for cooling and Women are reporting rising cases of domestic violence and health issues due to heat stress. Infants and elderly are at highest risk. Migrant laborers from these areas serve the city and the industrial belt Farmers' protests are growing, with slogans like "No power, no food". A few have threatened suicide, reminiscent of a tragic incident last year. A viral video shows an elderly woman in a rural hamlet fanning her unconscious grandson due to heatstroke, saying, "The government gave us electricity on election day. Now where is it?" On the other hand, factory owners have warned of shutdowns and mass layoffs if power is cut for more than two days. The District Civil Surgeon pleads with you to not cut power to the city hospital: "One failed ventilator could mean ten deaths." Political representatives from both rural and urban areas are blaming each other, and you are accused of bias no matter what you decide. The State Power Minister subtly suggests, "We cannot afford negative media about failing industry. Make a practical choice." Your subordinate suggests cutting power to slums, saying "They have no votes." Your own elderly parents live in one of the villages, and are facing the same crisis, but you're told not to show "personal bias." (a) What are the ethical issues and conflicting duties involved in this situation? (b) If you had to rank these three sectors in priority, how would you do it and why? (c) Suppose a local TV channel offers you a platform to explain your decision. How would you communicate your choice ethically and transparently to a divided and emotionally charged public? (d) Suggest 3 long-term reforms to avoid such dilemmas in the future and ensure just distribution of scarce resources. (20 marks, 250 words)

20 marks · 250 words · 4 toppers answered this

GS4 · Case studies on the above issues

See this question on Topper's Copy by Hashin →

More GS4 questions →