GS4 · UPSC Mains

You are Rajesh, an honest IAS officer posted as the District Magistrate in a prominent district of a state. The State Public Service Commission exam was conducted last week. It is one of the biggest recruitment drives, with over 7 lakh candidates appearing, many from poor and rural backgrounds. Three days after the exam, a leaked question paper, matching the actual one, started circulating on social media. There is public outrage. Protests erupt outside your office. Several coaching institutes allege that a nexus involving a printing press official, a commission clerk, and a politician's aide facilitated the leak. The government is under pressure. You are asked to conduct a preliminary inquiry within 48 hours and submit a factual report. Meanwhile, you receive a phone call from a senior political leader, asking you to "go slow" as the accused is "a well-wisher" and "these things happen." The candidate who topped this exam is also the son of a senior bureaucrat. Moreover, your nephew has secured 8th rank in the exam in his last attempt, and this news has become viral on social media. There are rumors that the leak was targeted to help specific candidates. A strong inquiry may lead to cancellation of the exam, affecting lakhs of students. On the other hand, going soft may protect your career. (a) What are the options available to you? (b) What course of action would you choose to ensure that justice is done without causing unnecessary hardship to innocent candidates? (c) Are there any safeguards in the current setup to prevent harassment of innocent officers like Rajesh? What further measures need to be taken? (d) "Even the strongest regulatory mechanisms cannot prevent paper leaks completely". Do you agree? (20 marks, 250 words)

20 marks · 250 words · 2 toppers answered this

GS4 · Case studies on the above issues

See this question on Topper's Copy by Hashin →

More GS4 questions →